I think JPG is designed to be rapidly compressed with low requirements on resources and power. And consumer electronics programmers are weird, having many clues and concerns about many things but not so many of either about how software users are going about their business. Image processing scientists are weird and probably like JPEG better due to it being some kind of a mathematical transformation of the image data instead of a lame compression of imagedata as if it were any other kind of data, which is mostly what PNG is. let me brainstorm some.Įven a maximum quality jpg is easily half the size of a png. Personally, I have no use for anything but PNG, but there's a lot of reasons.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |